Andrew Mason (Warwick): When are appearance norms unjust?

Wednesday 2nd of October from 11-12:30 in Edgecliffe G03.

Abstract: Appearance norms are often a matter of public concern. Some seem objectionable because they are sex-biased or race-biased, whilst others are morally problematic because they are demanding, costly not to comply with, and have harmful consequences. The issue of when an appearance norm is unjust and what makes it so merits deeper consideration. A number of potential sources of injustice are examined: first, that an appearance norm is unjust when it is unfair because of the unequal burdens it imposes on different groups; second, that it is unjust when compliance with it would worsen unjust disadvantages or burden those who have been unjustly disadvantaged; third, that it is unjust when it is demeaning or disrespectful; fourth, that it is unjust when the costs related to compliance and non-compliance mean that it (or, more precisely, the practice in which it is embedded) is oppressive or compromises individual liberty; fifth, that it is unjust when compliance with it is harmful.